> Jimmy Cincinnati Wrote:
> -------------------------------------------------------
> I think we've boiled it down to the crux of it, your definition of a
> child is the religiously decreed life begins at conception vs viability.
>
> The only constant point you can reference for when life begins is
> conception. Viability does not dictate life. Once the egg is fertilized,
> when left in normal conditions it will grow into a person like you & I.
> There is no magical principal that suddenly declares person hood when
> the child travels 6 inches out the vaginal canal.
>
> People on life support are not viable, should we be able to kill them?
>
> It's not killing a child, it's not having a child.
>
> The only way to "not have the child" is to kill it. Stop sugar coating
> it.
>
> Whats funny is when someone has a planned pregnancy they are pregnant
> with a baby. When its unplanned some how its considered less than
> human... a bundle of cells.
>
> and that should be the choice of the people who would have to care for
> it, based on whether they could care for it.
>
> Murder should never be any ones choice... its evil. We dont kill someone
> because life will be tough.
All you can do is reiterate that we disagree