> Stephen Keller Wrote:
> -------------------------------------------------------
> Really, this is interesting, as I thought nat gas was one of the cleaner
> fuels, if going to electric though, especially for heating in cold
> climates, it is going to be very expensive, and has to be generated
> somehow, will be cool to follow how they do that.
One of our wonderful new generation of congresswomen has the right idea
Seriously though, energy cannot be made only changed from one form to another!
That picture as well as other pictures and videos of perpetual motion generators are faked.
Nuclear energy uses more energy to produce then it produces, it’s subsidized by the government, uses oil/diesel power equipment and contaminates earth during the mining and processing as well as accidents and of course trying to get rid spent materials,
Solar energy and wind energy needs rare earth materials that are mined and are very highly toxic to produce/recycle and when the sun isn’t shining or the wind isn’t blowing you do not have any energy being produced, water power and dams are about the least polluting (after all the energy and pollution it takes to build a dam and generators, transformers, distribution etc.) but damming and hot water being discharged ecologically changes the landscape and kills/killed many species of fish and wildlife and no water no power,
There is really nothing we can use as an energy source that doesn’t come from the earth, contaminates, pollutes and kills something,
Probably going to end up like Solent green when you got a pedal power your household and in other ways too.
